Optimal compromise between energy efficiency and version reduction
Please also consider: In order to cover as many applications as possible with a single version, the reduction of versions sometimes leads to a deliberate overdimensioning of some drives. However, the greater the distance the drive has from its optimum operating point, the lower its efficiency and thus energy efficiency. This inevitably increases the energy consumption.
When reducing the number of versions, project costs tend to rise slightly as larger drives are used in some cases, which leads to additional costs compared to customised dimensioning. In return, however, the operator benefits from optimised operation of his system and significant cost savings in the areas of administration, service and spare parts stocking over the entire service life of the drives. The system integrator also saves costs, for example in engineering, through a systematic version reduction.
The goal, however, is not to reduce versions as far as possible since project costs can escalate above a certain threshold. In addition, a small number of versions leads to reduced efficiency of the drives used due to more frequent overdimensioning. It is therefore important for projects to find the optimum mix of the version number-dependent costs for investment, operation (administration, service, spare parts stocking) and energy. A balanced combination of version reduction and energy efficiency can lead to high TCO reductions. Drive systems, that are included in NORD DRIVESYSTEMS modern range of high efficiency products, unite the advantages of both optimisation strategies.